Tuesday 3 March 2015

3 Myths About Eye Surgery Debunked

What can easily be labeled as the most popular vision correction treatment is what we know as lasik treatment. Scores of people not just in Sydney but across the world benefit from this advanced eye surgery. It has helped hundreds and thousands of people around the world correct their vision related problems as well as other eye related diseases which were giving them a hard time otherwise. However, like most of the popular treatments, this treatment too is surrounded by with plenty of rumors and myths which naturally instill some doubts and suspicions in the minds of the people. Some of these myths also create wrong perception about this treatment in their minds, which is not a very favorable situation to have as it leads to over expectations followed by disappointment. This post will debunk some of these misperceptions and present real facts about lasik eye surgery.

Myth 1: LASIK is a relatively new eye surgery

Fact: It is one of those myths which compel a lot of people to not give too much importance to stats related to this eye surgery, as they tend to believe that long term effects of the surgery cannot be ascertained or analyzed for such a surgery as it is still new. But the fact remains that this surgery is almost two decades old now. So there is substantial amount of data available for doctors and statisticians to analyze the efficacy as well as side effects of this treatment.

Myth 2: LASIK is not a real eye surgery

Fact: Just because surgical blades and scissors are not used during this procedure does not mean that it cannot be treated as a real surgery. In fact, lasik happens to be among the most delicate forms of surgery which require both skill and experience to master it. This is the reason why only a handful of eye specialists perform eye surgery procedure in Sydney.

Myth 3: One should choose a surgeon based on the number of cases he or she has undertaken

Fact: Although it is true that experience plays a very important role toward the success of this treatment, it does not mean that it should be treated as the sole criterion for selection. Once a surgeon has passed a threshold limit of around 400 to 500 cases, it is the quality of the surgery that becomes of prime importance, and not the quantity of procedures.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment